您的位置: 专家智库 > >

国家自然科学基金(40871104)

作品数:2 被引量:39H指数:2
相关作者:龚冬琴沈晔娜陈丁江金培坚史一鸣更多>>
相关机构:浙江大学更多>>
发文基金:国家自然科学基金国家高技术研究发展计划更多>>
相关领域:环境科学与工程更多>>

文献类型

  • 2篇中文期刊文章

领域

  • 2篇环境科学与工...

主题

  • 2篇污染
  • 1篇地球化
  • 1篇地球化学
  • 1篇地球化学数据
  • 1篇点源
  • 1篇点源污染
  • 1篇水环境
  • 1篇水环境容量
  • 1篇总氮
  • 1篇响应流
  • 1篇流域污染
  • 1篇化学数据
  • 1篇环境容量
  • 1篇河流
  • 1篇河流流量
  • 1篇河流水
  • 1篇河流水环境
  • 1篇河流水环境容...
  • 1篇非点源
  • 1篇非点源污染

机构

  • 1篇浙江大学

作者

  • 1篇吕军
  • 1篇史一鸣
  • 1篇金培坚
  • 1篇陈丁江
  • 1篇沈晔娜
  • 1篇龚冬琴

传媒

  • 1篇环境科学
  • 1篇Pedosp...

年份

  • 1篇2011
  • 1篇2010
2 条 记 录,以下是 1-2
排序方式:
非点源污染河流水环境容量的不确定性分析被引量:26
2010年
基于河流一维水环境容量计算模型和实测水文水质参数的统计分析,应用MonteCarlo模拟方法,分析模型各输入参数的灵敏度以及水环境容量值的概率分布,建立了非点源污染河流水环境容量的分期不确定性分析方法.本方法表达了由于获取的河流系统信息不确定性和非点源污染发生的随机性引起的水环境容量计算结果不确定性,给出了不同水文期在不同可信度下的河流水环境容量,为实现非点源污染的总量控制提供了可靠的基础.应用本方法,对长乐江的总氮水环境容量进行了不确定性分析.结果表明,根据水质控制目标,枯水期、平水期、丰水期中90%可信度的总氮水环境容量分别为487.9、949.8、1392.8kg·d-1,其中稀释容量是各水文期水环境容量的主要组成部分.据此,各水文期流域内的总氮现状入河量需削减1258.3~3591.2kg·d-1,丰水期是削减量最大的时期.不确定性分析方法计算得到的水环境容量是基于非点源污染河流水文水质状况的实际变化,这相对于按某一设计流量来确定水环境容量的常规方法更为科学、合理,拓展了水环境容量的研究思路和方法.
陈丁江吕军金培坚沈晔娜史一鸣龚冬琴
关键词:水环境容量非点源污染MONTECARLO模拟河流总氮
Response of Stream Pollution Characteristics to Catchment Land Cover in Cao-E River Basin, China被引量:13
2011年
This study addressed the relationship of river water pollution characteristics to land covers and human activities in the catchments in a complete river system named Cao-E River in eastern China.Based on the hydrogeochemical data collected monthly over a period of 3 years,cluster analysis(CA) and principal component analysis(PCA) were adopted to categorize the river reaches and reveal their pollution characteristics.According to the differences of water quality in the river reaches and land use patterns and average population densities in their catchments,the whole river system could be categorized into three groups of river reaches,i.e.,non-point sources pollution reaches(NPSPR),urban reaches(UR) and mixed sources pollution reaches(MSPR).In UR and MSPR,the water quality was mainly impacted by nutrient and organic pollution,while in NPSPR nutrient pollution was the main cause.The nitrate was the main nitrogen form in NPSPR and particulate phosphorus was the main phosphorus form in MSPR.There were no apparent trends for the variations of pollutant concentrations with increasing river flows in NPSPR and MSPR,while in UR the pollutant concentrations decreased with increasing river flows.Thus dry season was the critical period for water pollution control in UR.Therefore,catchment land covers and human activities had significant impact on river reach water pollution type,nutrient forms and water quality responses to hydrological conditions,which might be crucial for developing strategies to combat water pollution in watershed scale.
SHEN Ye-NaLUE JunCHEN Ding-JiangSHI Yi-Ming
关键词:流域污染响应流河流流量地球化学数据
共1页<1>
聚类工具0